Extreme Urgent: The Statute of Limitation of The Criminal Justice Proceeding Will Expire Soon For The Corruption Crimes, Which Framed Sherry Chen in The Falsified Espionage Case

It is the extreme urgent right now for Sherry Chen to follow with 42 U.S. House Reps for the criminal justice for herself, since the federal criminal code has the 7-year statute of limitation, it will expire soon in her case. After 7 years, Sherry Chen will no longer be able to pursue the criminal justice proceeding for the matter of her being framed with the falsified espionage charges.

There was several reporting about Sherry Chen’s falsified espionage case during the last several years, which was finally dropped by United States district attorneys. Later Sherry Chen filed the civil ligation for her loss and damages in the falsified espionage case. As she claimed in the civil ligation case, U.S. federal government had the accountability for her loss and her damages and should compensate her for the loss and damages, including her huge attorney fees in the falsified espionage case.

There have been the donation events in Chinese community for Sherry Chen for her owed attorney fees for years.

However, this civil ligation, which Sherry Chen filed, will not bring the criminal justice for her at all, because in U.S. legal proceeding, there are two separate legal proceedings for the crime victims: one is the criminal justice proceeding and one is the civil litigation proceeding. These two proceedings are irrelevant. The civil litigation could only bring the money compensation if it is successful, but it will not bring the criminal charges upon the suspects, who had framed Sherry Chen with the falsified espionage charges upon her. Thus, Sherry Chen’s civil litigation case will not bring the criminal justice for her.

Framing innocent one with the falsified criminal charges is the felony crimes. Those federal staffs and agents, who had framed Sherry Chen in the falsified espionage case, had committed multi felony. Until today, those corrupted federal staffs and agents had not been prosecuted for their felony crimes of framing Sherry Chen based on federal criminal law. The criminal justice has not been served for Sherry Chen.

In 2015, the 42 U.S. House Reps wrote their inquiry letter to U.S. Attorney General Lynch for Sherry Chen and Xiaoxing Xi for their falsified espionage cases, when United States district attorneys failed to file any criminals upon the corrupted federal agents and staffs, who had framed them in their falsified espionage cases. Since 2015, there were no replies yet from DOJ and AG.

However, U.S. federal criminal codes has 7 years statute of limitation; after 7 years, Sherry Chen will no longer be able to pursue any criminal charges upon those corrupted federal staffs and agents, who had framed Sherry Chen in the falsified espionage case. Losing the chance for the criminal justice will cause the damages tremendously upon Sherry Chen, it will not be recovered after it passes the 7-year statute of limitation.

It is extreme urgent right now for Sherry Chen since her case came into the 7th year, the statute of limitation of her case is running out soon. Sherry Chen should take the necessary action with the 42 U.S. House Reps right now, after the 42 U.S. House Reps inquired DOJ AG Lynch for Sherry Chen in 2015.

Chinese community should support Sherry Chen to follow up with the 42 U.S. House Reps.

Recently, there is astonishing reporting about rape cases in Australia, one rape case: “Despite her ordeal, Leu was told by her fellow international students not to go to the police. ‘We thought Australian law only protects Australians,’ she said. ‘And, if we report things like this, they’d probably think we’re causing trouble and we’d get deported so we can’t finish school.’ ”

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/around-30-students-sexually-harassed-every-day-in-australia/news-story/49573f4ce7b4c662be651c15ae2a740d?from=singlemessage

Note: O.J. Simpson murder case is the good example to explain two U.S. legal proceedings for the crime victims: 1. In the criminal court, Henry Lee and attorneys messed the case, O.J. Simpson was escaped from the criminal justice. 2. In the civil litigation case, jury found O.J. Simpson accountability for the deaths of her ex-wife and the boy friend, jury awarded the huge compensation for the two victims families. However, most people thought that the criminal justice did not serve in O.J. Simpson murdering case, the civil litigation compensation is not the criminal justice, no matter how big the rewards is.

Framing an innocent with falsified criminal charges is the crime, multiple-felony crime, see the professional lawyer’s analysis of framing one innocent: https://www.quora.com/Is-framing-someone-for-a-crime-a-crime

(The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Get Real America. )